LinkedIn post from a real work experience, minus the cringe

Turns something that actually happened at work into a short LinkedIn post with a usable lesson, no broetry, no humblebrag and no invented detail.

At a glance

Best for: Professionals who want to post about real work on LinkedIn without the formulaic style that makes people scroll past.
Tested on: Claude · Opus 5.5
You fill in: experiencelessonreaders
You get: You gave me the numbers, the cause and the missed signal, so I've skipped the questions. Post Two weeks after I shipped our new pricing page,… (full result below)

writing

social-media

career

content-creation

Prompt

Help me write a LinkedIn post about something that actually happened at work.

What happened: {{experience}}
What I took from it: {{lesson}}
Who I'd like to read it: {{readers}}

Before writing, ask me up to 3 questions if a concrete detail is missing (a number, what someone said, what I did afterward). If you have enough, say so and skip the questions.

Rules for the post:

• 120-200 words. The first line states the specific situation, not a lesson or a question.

• No one-sentence-per-line formatting; use short normal paragraphs.

• Don't make me the hero. Include one thing I got wrong or didn't know.

• No "Here's what I learned:", "Let that sink in", "Agree?", "I'm humbled", no emojis, and at most 2 hashtags at the end.

• The lesson is something a reader could act on next week, stated once, near the end.

• Don't invent details. If I didn't give you a fact, don't add it.

Then give me one alternative first line, and flag any sentence that could come across as a humblebrag.

Fill in

{{experience}}: What happened, with numbers and specificse.g. Shipped a pricing page redesign; trial conversion fell from 4.1% to 3.2% and we rolled it back
{{lesson}}: What you took from ite.g. put the thing people came for where they can see it
{{readers}}: Who you want to reache.g. other product designers and PMs

Example input

experience: Last month I shipped a pricing page redesign I was proud of. Within two weeks, conversion to trial dropped from 4.1% to 3.2%, and we rolled it back. The old page showed the price without scrolling; my version moved it below a comparison table because I thought the table was more persuasive. In the first week a support rep flagged "people asking where the price is," and I dismissed it as noise.
lesson: Put the thing people came for where they can see it. And during a launch, treat support tickets as data.
readers: other product designers and PMs

1.1k0

Generated Outputs (1)

2 hours ago

Claude

Opus 5.5

2 hours ago

Generated Output

You gave me the numbers, the cause and the missed signal, so I've skipped the questions.

Post

Two weeks after I shipped our new pricing page, conversion to trial had dropped from 4.1% to 3.2%. We rolled it back.

I'd moved the price below a comparison table. I thought the table made the stronger case, so people should see it first. What I'd missed is that the price was the thing people came to the page for, and I'd made them scroll to find it.

The part I'm less proud of: in the first week, a support rep flagged that people were asking where the price was. I read it as noise. It was the clearest signal we had, and it arrived before the numbers made the problem obvious.

So, two rules I'm taking into the next project. On any page, make sure the thing people came for is visible without scrolling, before worrying about persuasion. And during a launch, read support tickets as data, because they can tell you what's wrong before your dashboards do.

If you're shipping a page this month, ask your support team what people are asking about it.

#productdesign #ux

Alternative first line
"Our trial conversion dropped from 4.1% to 3.2%, and the cause was a design decision I was proud of."

Humblebrag check
Nothing reads as a humblebrag. The nearest risk is the alternative first line: "a design decision I was proud of" can sound like fishing for reassurance. It works because the next sentences take responsibility; if you use it, don't soften what follows.

Why it works

The "ask up to 3 questions, or say you have enough" step stops the model padding a thin story with invented detail, and "don't invent details" backs it up. Banning the one-line-per-sentence format and the stock phrases removes the most recognizable LinkedIn tics. "Include one thing I got wrong" is what makes a work story credible rather than self-promotional. Putting the lesson once, near the end keeps the post a story instead of a lecture, and the humblebrag check catches the tone problems you can't see in your own writing.

When not to use it

Skip it if nothing concrete happened: the prompt depends on real specifics, and a "lessons from my career" post with no story will still be generic. Check with your employer before sharing internal metrics. For announcements (new job, launch), a plain two-line post usually beats a story.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!